|
|
ALife (artificial life)
focuses on hypothesis construction and scenario-building, and so pioneers
a new scientific method that relies on the designer's method, conceiving
and modeling hypothetical scenarios and observing how they play out.
An emerging discipline, ALife is ready to reach beyond its focused community
to show the relevance of its methods and models to
- address key scientific questions and engineering challenges of our
time, such as understanding the process of biological evolution; offer
new insights on the relevance of information theory to evolvable, emergent
processes;
- enhance understanding of the subtle self-regulation of adapting,
evolving living systems;
- contribute knowledge about self-organizing, self-healing processes
that may be relevant to understanding those processes in living systems;
- increase our capacity to apply evolutionary process models to agent-based
task allocation and collaborative problem-solving in bio-inspired collaborative
agents and robot systems;
- support new project-based collaborations for ALife researchers with
industry partners and other sponsors.
|
FROM GAMES TO APPS: Designing Artificial Life Challenges |
|
|
This think tank session entertained blue sky ideas “across the game board” for ALife challenges/ competitions that could demonstrate the potential of ALife to contribute to scientific knowledge and technology development. The following questions were our starting point to come up with some strong ideas to develop into competitions:
- How can artificial life models offer insight on the technical hurdles for a truly grand challenge — the synthesis of life?
- What competition ideas would best showcase what ALife can offer toward technological innovation and as a new method to develop and test scientific hypotheses?
- What can ALife contribute to current debates about Darwinian evolution?
We explored how ALife Challenges can create an "ecosystem for innovation," serving as Petri dishes to culture ALife models that shed light on the big science and technology questions of our time.
Part
I. |
Designing
ALife Challenges |
|
|
Date/Location: |
|
June 4, 2006 at ALife
X, 7 PM to 10 PM |
Co-Chairs: |
|
Zann Gill, Director, ESAC Mark
Bedau, Co-Founder, European
Center for Living Technology and Editor-in-Chief, Artificial
Life (MIT Press Journal) |
Panelists: |
|
Christoph Adami, Professor, Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences, studying how digital organisms evolve and collaborating with NASA JPL.
Dario Floreano, Professor and Director, Laboratory of Intelligent Systems, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne.
Natalio
Krasnogor, Automated Scheduling, Planning
and Optimisation Group, Sciences and Information Technology,
University of Nottingham.
Norman Packard,CEO, ProtoLife and Co-Founder, European Center for Living Technology.
Jordan
Pollack, DEMO Lab, Computer Science Department
Volen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University.
Peter
Wills, Department of Physics, University
of Auckland.
|
Filmmakers recorded the session: |
|
Robert Anderson Clift, Producer/ Director for PBS. Recent projects:
Eric Donald Harvey, former videographer, Discovery Channel
|
Submissions: |
|
ALife Challenge ideas.
For diversion, while preparing your chapter submission and/or specifying your proposed ALife Challenge, take a break to watch the gridbugs eat, mutate, and evolve.
|
|
Part
II. |
FLAGSHIP
COMPETITION
An "Is it Alive?" Prize |
|
|
Can ALife make a significant contribution to
debates about the nature of biological evolution? Criteria
for awarding an "Is it Alive?" Prize is under debate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|